The author has shared a Podcast.You will need to accept and consent to the use of cookies and similar technologies by our third-party partners (including: YouTube, Instagram or Twitter), in order to view embedded content in this article and others you may visit in future.
Subscribe to the BoF Podcast here.
Background:
In early April, President Donald Trump announced an unprecedented wave of tariffs, imposing duties as high as 145 percent on imports from China. Among the rationales offered were the prospect of a US manufacturing renaissance.
The American fashion sector â heavily reliant on overseas production, particularly in China â now faces significant disruption. Some brands are adapting quickly, leveraging their domestic operations and leaning into a âMade in USAâ identity. Others are reevaluating their reliance on China as their primary sourcing destination. But the prospect of a mass return of garment manufacturing jobs remains a remote possibility, most economists and fashion industry experts say.
In this episode of The Debrief, BoF correspondents Malique Morris and Marc Bain join executive editor Brian Baskin and senior correspondent Sheena Butler-Young to assess whether the dream of American-made fashion is any closer to reality.
Key Insights:
- The âMade in USAâ dream remains out of reach due to the lack of US manufacturing infrastructure. âThe infrastructure just literally isnât here,â says Bain. âEven if you use US grown cotton, most of the time that cotton is shipped out of the US to be spun into yarn and woven into fabric somewhere else. These are all sorts of things that we just donât have here. Itâs been lost over decades and it would take decades to get it back.â
- Brands that already manufacture domestically are seeing success from marketing craftsmanship, experience and emotional value. The outdoor clothing company Filson, for example, offers walking tours around their manufacturing facility that shares a space with their Seattle headquarters. âFashion is already an emotional purchase, and consumers do care about the story behind a brand. Thatâs why brand marketing is so important for building the label,â says Morris. âThis is another way to tap into that. Itâs storytelling, not nationalism.â
- Whereas the US has a lack of infrastructure for manufacturing, China is in the exact opposite position. Small brands might have their supply chain concentrated in one geographical area and are especially vulnerable to tariff changes. âIf that area happens to be China and suddenly thereâs this giant more than doubling of tariffs, you are in serious trouble,â says Bain.
- Although cheap overseas clothing companies like Shein and Quince will now be subject to increased duties, consumers wonât abandon cheap fashion overnight. âEven if [middle-class shoppers] are not going to buy American-made brands that are significantly more expensive, maybe theyâll go second-hand, maybe theyâll vintage,â says Morris. âI think the hope here is that people will just get conditioned out of the idea that they can get $2 jeans and a $10 dress.â